Release confidence for agent‑driven teams.
Your agents write the code and the tests. TestChimp monitors your QA posture, runs a feedback loop that keeps your agents closing the gaps, and shows you release health before you ship.
14 days, no credit card. Works with any coding agent.
- Hours saved per month
- 120
- Faster test authoring
- 10X
- More coverage
- 80%
- Annual savings
- $450K
More tests.Yet less confidence.
Agents now write the code and the tests. Despite large suites, teams lack visibility into gaps in testing, which tests can be trusted, and whether a release is good to go. TestChimp monitors your QA posture and runs a feedback loop with your agents, so QA keeps up as your product evolves.
Four things you always know.
TestChimp runs a closed loop between what your product should do, what your tests prove and what your agents fix. Every turn of the loop keeps four answers current.
Know what’s intended.
Stories and scenarios live as Markdown in your repo, where agents read them and people review them. MeetBots capture decisions from your calls, and AgentWatch picks up requirement changes from your coding-agent sessions.
Test planning as codeMeetBotsAgentWatch

Know what’s tested.
TestChimp measures your QA posture three ways: semantic coverage of your requirements, API schema coverage from the payloads your tests produce, and TrueCoverage against how real users behave. ExploreChimp walks the app along your tests and flags UX issues.
QA intelligenceTrueCoverageExploreChimp

Know what’s missing.
Run /testchimp upkeep on your release cadence. It ranks the gaps by risk, hands them to your agents to close, and trims the tests that add CI time without adding coverage.

Know it’s ready.
Create a release and TestChimp shows its health: functional and non-functional checks in one view, with each test’s verification status, including the ones an agent has changed since a person verified them. You sign off on evidence, not hope.
Release managementVerified tests

Your whole QA process, down to two commands.
Install the TestChimp skill and MCP in the coding agent you already use. Planning, authoring, measuring and upkeep then run behind two commands.
After every feature branch
/testchimp run QAUpdates the plans for what changed, writes traceable tests against them, and runs UX checks with ExploreChimp.
On your release cadence
/testchimp upkeepFinds the gaps in your QA posture, ranks them by risk, closes them, and trims tests that cost CI time without adding coverage.
Plain Playwright, instrumented for measurement.
When your agent writes tests with the TestChimp skill, it instruments them so your QA posture becomes measurable. Tests stay in your repo, running anywhere Playwright runs.
tests/checkout/promo-stacking.spec.tswritten by your agent with the TestChimp skillimport { test, expect } from '@testchimp/playwright';test('stacks a promo code with a gift card', {annotation: [{ type: 'scenario', description: '#TS-142' }],}, async ({ page, markScreenState }) => {await page.goto('/cart');await page.getByLabel('Promo code').fill('SPRING10');await page.getByRole('button', { name: 'Apply' }).click();await markScreenState('Cart', 'Promo applied');await expect(page.getByTestId('total')).toHaveText('$81.00');});
- Line 1The TestChimp fixtureCaptures API payloads and tags user events around the test: API schema coverage and TrueCoverage
- Line 4A scenario annotationLinks the test to scenario #TS-142 for requirement coverage
- Line 9markScreenStateMarks the screen for ExploreChimp and Atlas
Works with any coding agent that takes a skill and MCP, including Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Kiro and GitHub Copilot.
You steer. Agents do the work.
People decide what the product should do and when it ships. Agents do the testing in between. TestChimp gives you the controls to steer them and the record to trust them.
Accountability
A person verifies the tests that matter, and the badge stays with the test. When an agent later edits a verified test, TestChimp marks it stale and asks the original verifier to check it again. Release views show every test’s verification status, stale ones included.
Verified testsGap governance
Every gap is known and handled. Ignore it to cut the noise, create a test to close it, or open an issue to track it for later.
Manual testing in the release
Capture manual sessions with evidence from the Chrome extension or TestChimp Studio. The results sit beside your automated runs in the same release.
Policies the whole team shares
Your project’s nuances and your team’s decisions become policies, so people and agents work in unison, and every agent action links to the policy behind it.
Issues in one place
Review and audit what ExploreChimp, security scans and performance tests report, without another platform for issues.
A fintech startup reached 99% coverage in six weeks.
They connected TestChimp to their repo and their agents, covered more than 1,100 scenarios, and have held coverage at that level for months since.
Trusted by 400+ startups and enterprises
One platform, built around the loop.
Measure posture
What is tested, how well, and what is missing.
The agentic loop
Your agents close the gaps the posture reveals.
Questions developers ask first.
Claude can already write tests. Why do I need TestChimp?
Which coding agents does TestChimp work with?
Am I locked in?
Where do my plans and tests live?
We already have QA engineers. Where does TestChimp fit?
How is this different from TestRail, Momentic or QA Wolf?
What does it cost to try?

Your agents can write tests. The chimp makes sure they’re the right ones.
Set up in one session. After that, QA is two commands.
14 days, no credit card.




